Central banks’ hard-won credibility and independence is threatened by the
growing dependence on easy and abundant money by governments and financial
markets, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said.
The
inability of many governments to tackle major challenges, both
short-term deficits and the looming costs of unfunded pensions and healthcare
systems, may put central banks under pressure to provide further stimulus,
especially if economic growth remains sluggish.
“However, there is a growing risk of overburdening
monetary policy,” BIS said in its annual report. “Any positive
effects of easy monetary policy may be shrinking whereas the negative side
effects may be growing.”
But most central
bankers, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, are confident they
can tighten policy in time, pointing to inflationary expectations that remain
stable, a sign that central banks’ inflation-fighting credentials remain intact.
“Simply put: central banks
are being cornered into prolonging monetary stimulus as governments drag their
feet and adjustment is delayed,” BIS said, warning that this “intense pressure
puts at risk the central banks’ price stability objective, their credibility
and, ultimately, their independence.”
Near-zero interest rates weaken incentives for
the private sector to shore up their balance sheets and for governments to stop
borrowing. It also distorts the financial system by triggering a hunt for yield
and excessive risk-taking, BIS said.
Although inflationary expectations currently are
stable and close to central banks’ goals, BIS said this should not be seen as a
green light for more stimulus.
“A
vicious circle can develop, with a widening gap between what central banks are
expected to deliver and what they can actually deliver. This would make the
eventual exit from monetary accommodation harder and may ultimately threaten
central banks’ credibility,” BIS said, adding:
“If central banks’
credibility were to be eroded and inflation expectations were to pick up, it
would be very difficult and costly to restore price stability, as the
experience of the 1970s has shown.”
Central banks vast holdings
of government bonds -- total assets held by central banks have more than
doubled over the past four years to around $18 trillion at the end of 2011 –
presents a threat to their independence as it starts to blur the lines between
monetary and fiscal policy. In the United States, for example, the Federal
Reserve purchased 60 percent of all newly issued Treasury bonds last year, in
effect subsidizing Washington’s spending.
“…central banks face the risk that, once the
time comes to tighten monetary policy, the sheer size and scale of their
unconventional measures will prevent a timely exit from monetary stimulus,
thereby jeopardising price stability. The result would be a decisive loss of
central bank credibility and possibly even independence.”
Financial losses on their
huge balance sheets could also undermine central banks’ operational autonomy if
they have to rely on governments for funding.
Low interest rates can also
mask underlying financial problems, BIS said, looking back at Japan in the
1990s when insolvent borrowers and banks were supported, artificially inflating
asset prices that posed a risk to financial stability.
“An even more important
lesson is that underlying structural problems must be corrected during the
recovery or we risk creating conditions that will lead rapidly to the next
crisis,” BIS said.
Loose monetary policy in
advanced economies since the 2008 global financial crises also presents a
threat to emerging economies.
High interest rates in rapidly-growing
emerging economies attracts money and puts upward pressure on exchange rates.
But out of fear of boosting capital inflows even further, those central banks hesitate
to raise rates. Interest rates may therefore be systematically too loose in
emerging markets, helping fuel a boom in credit and asset prices, BIS said.
“This creates risks of
rising financial imbalances similar to those seen in advanced economies in the
years immediately preceding the crisis. Their unwinding would have significant
negative repercussions, also globally as a result of the increased weight of
emerging market economies in the world economy and in investment portfolios,“
said BIS.
“This points to the need
for central banks to take better account of the global spillovers from their
domestic monetary policies to ensure lasting financial and price stability.”
Another effect of loose
global monetary policy is to push up commodity prices, and thus inflation,
because of their close link to global demand. The growing role of investors in
those markets may also have increased the sensitivity of commodity prices to
monetary policy, BIS said.
Finally, an analysis that makes sense. Why don't the CBs listen? Does Bernanke bother to read this? Hey Ben, have you taken a look at the shrinking size of food products? A half gallon is not a half gallon any more. A quart is 24 ounces. Inflation is disguised. Go to the store and do some real analysis.
ReplyDelete